Welkom op het forum van startpagina!

Dit forum staat op alleen-lezen. Je kan hier informatie zoeken en oude berichten terugvinden, maar geen nieuwe berichten plaatsen.

Naar overzicht van alle forums

Chronologisch Overzicht Lerende Organisaties

  • Gerrit Visser

    In de ‘Learning-Org Dialog on Learning Organizations’ is als LO25873 een chronologische overzicht gepost van de concepten die ten grondslag liggen aan de theorievorming over de Lerende Organisaties. Het plaatst de roots van de lerende organisatie in een historisch perspektief.

    Chronology of Learning Organization Concepts

    1938: In his book “Experience and Education,” John Dewey publicizes the

    concept of experiential learning as an ongoing cycle of activity.

    1940s: The Macy Conferences – featuring Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson,

    and Lawrence Kubie – bring “systems thinking” to the awareness of a

    cross-disciplinary group of intellectuals.

    1940s: Scottish psychologist Kenneth Craik coins the term “mental models,”

    which later makes its way to MIT through Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert.

    1946: Kurt Lewin, founding theorist of National Training Laboratories,

    proposes idea of a “creative tension” between personal vision and a sense

    of reality.

    1956: Edgar Schein's research on brainwashing in Korea paves the way for

    an understanding of “process consultation.”

    1960: “The Human Side of Enterprise,” by Douglas McGregor, is published.

    1961: Jay Forrester publishes “Industrial Dynamics.” This book, the first

    major application of system dynamics to corporations, describes the

    turbulence within a typical appliance value chain.

    1970: Chris Argyris and Donald Schon begin work on “action science,” the

    study of how espoused values clash with the values that underlie real

    actions.

    1972: "The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on

    the Predicament of Mankind," by Donella Meadows and Dennis Meadows, is

    published. The book draws on Forrester's theories about system dynamics.

    1971 to 1979: Erhard Seminars Training ( EST ) demonstrate the kind of

    powerful attitude shifts that can occur during a seminar that lasts

    several days.

    1979: Consultant Charlie Kiefer, Forrester student Peter Senge, and

    researcher-artist Robert Fritz design the “Leadership and Mastery”

    seminar, which becomes the focal point of their new consulting firm,

    Innovation Associates.

    1982: Senge, Arie de Geus, Hanover Insurance CEO Bill O'Brien, Analog

    Devices CEO Ray Stata, and other executive leaders form a

    learning-organization study group, which meets regularly at MIT.

    1984 to 1985: Pierre Wack, scenario planner at Royal Dutch/Shell, spends a

    sabbatical at Harvard Business School and writes two articles about

    scenario planning as a learning activity.

    1987: Peter Schwartz, Stewart Brand, Napier Collyns, Jay Ogilvy, and

    Lawrence Wilkinson form the Global Business Network, with a charter to

    foster organizational learning through scenario planning.

    1989: Oxford University management scholar Bill Isaacs, an associate of

    quantum physicist David Bohm, introduces Senge to the concept of dialogue

    as a process for building team capability.

    1989: “The Age of Unreason,” by Charles Handy, is published.

    1989: The Center for Organizational Learning is formed at MIT, with Senge

    as director and with Ed Schein, Chris Argyris, Arie de Geus, Ray Stata,

    and Bill O'Brien as key advisers. The staff of the “learning center,” as

    it's called, includes Bill Isaacs, Daniel Kim ( whose research involves

    linking the learning organization work to the quality movement ), and

    research director George Roth.

    1990: “The Fifth Discipline” is published. The book draws on many

    influences: system dynamics, “personal mastery” ( based on Fritz's work

    and the concept of creative tension ), mental models ( based on Wack's and

    Argyris's work ), shared vision ( based on work done at Innovation

    Associates ), and team learning ( based on David Bohm's concepts ).

    1990: Daniel Kim founds the “Systems Thinker,” a newsletter devoted to

    “fifth discipline” issues. The following year, the newsletter's parent

    organization, Pegasus Communications, launches an annual conference series

    called Systems Thinking in Action.

    1993: Harvard University professor David Garvin publishes an article on

    organizational learning in the Harvard Business Review, arguing that only

    learning that can be measured will be useful to managers.

    1994: “The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook” is published. Authors of the book,

    which Senge edited, include Charlotte Roberts, Rick Ross, and Bryan Smith

    ( president of Innovation Associates of Canada ), and Art Kleiner ( who

    serves as editorial director ). The “Fieldbook” becomes a new

    management-book genre.

    1994: The use of “learning histories” as a method of assessment begins at

    the Center for Organizational Learning.

    1994: The first major Organizational Learning Center projects reach

    completion. Many of them have produced remarkable results. But a few have

    resulted in disappointing career prospects for some of the line leaders

    who were involved in them.

    1995: Working with Dee Hock, the Organizational Learning Center begins a

    two-year process of building an ambitious international consortium called

    the Society for Organizational Learning, with Peter Senge as chairman.

    1996: “The Age of Heretics,” by Art Kleiner, and Synchronicity: "The Inner

    Path of Leadership," by Joseph Jaworski, are published.

    1997: “The Living Company,” by Arie de Geus, is published.

    1999: “The Dance of Change” is published.

    Alan Webber (May 1999) “Learning for a Change” Fast Company magazine.

    Issue 24, page 178

    Source: http://www.learning-org.com/

    History of Learning Organization LO25873 , 12 Jan 2001 , Peggy Stuart, pstuart@c2t2.ca

  • Martin Aerts

    Hoe behandel ik leden van de staf in een dienstverlenende organisatie (kunstonderwijs) om te gaan met de verandering welke ook hun deel is geworden toen ze uit hun functie van afdelingshoofd werden gehaald?

    Er is verzet tegen de maatregel mede omdat getwijfeld wordt aan het effect van de bezuiniging.

    Hoe kan men leren uit deze ervaring?